IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v31y2004i3p353-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships among government payments, crop insurance payments and crop revenue

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Hauser

Abstract

Risk abatement characteristics of a public sector programme (counter-cyclical payments) and a quasi-private market instrument (crop insurance) are assessed at the farm level. Crop market revenues and insurance payments have strong linkages to pre-planting price and yield conditions, whereas the conditions underlying government programme payments are less affected by prices, crop shares or actual yields. Contrary to a belief often expressed by producers, the counter-cyclical programme does not duplicate or substitute strongly for crop insurance programmes. It is also found that measurement of crop-revenue risk abatement from using either public or quasi-private instruments can be particularly sensitive to the price environment and components of market revenue. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Hauser, 2004. "Relationships among government payments, crop insurance payments and crop revenue," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 31(3), pages 353-368, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:31:y:2004:i:3:p:353-368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vedenov, Dmitry V. & Power, Gabriel J., 2008. "Risk-Reducing Effectiveness of Revenue versus Yield Insurance in the Presence of Government Payments," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Esther Boere & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2015. "Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy: Decoupling Agricultural Payments from Production and Promoting the Environment," Working Papers 2015-01, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    3. Cooper, Joseph C. & O'Donoghue, Erik J., 2011. "Identifying and Reducing Overlap in Farm Program Support," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103261, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Dai, Jiawu & Feng, Yuchen & Wang, Yan & Wang, Xiuqing, 2022. "Agricultural support and spatial price transmission: evidence from China’s maize sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(2), November.
    5. Anton, Jesus & Giner, Celine, 2005. "Can Risk Reducing Policies Reduce Farmer's Risk and Improve Their Welfare?," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24578, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:31:y:2004:i:3:p:353-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.