IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v20y1993i4p471-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory and Application of Risk Analysis in an Agricultural Development Setting: A Moroccan Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rafsnider, Giles T, et al

Abstract

Portfolio analysis, using nonlinear risk programming, was applied to identify the risk-efficient crop portfolios for a group of subsistence farmers. On average these individuals operated 6.5 hectares of crop land. It was shown that E-V approximations could be developed, using quadratic programming, which provide close estimates to maximum expected utility at various risk-aversion levels. The appropriate utility function form and an approximation of the level of risk aversion exhibited by small farmers were identified. Results suggest these farmers may be far less risk averse than previously believed. Coauthors are Ahmed Driouchi, Bernard V. Tew and Donald W. Reid. Copyright 1993 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafsnider, Giles T, et al, 1993. "Theory and Application of Risk Analysis in an Agricultural Development Setting: A Moroccan Case Study," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 20(4), pages 471-489.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:20:y:1993:i:4:p:471-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marius Rădulescu & Constanta Rădulescu & Gheorghiţă Zbăganu, 2014. "A portfolio theory approach to crop planning under environmental constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 243-264, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:20:y:1993:i:4:p:471-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.