IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v1y1973i2p191-212..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural policy: Banktruptcy of a ‘monodisciplinary’ economic approach

Author

Listed:
  • STEPHANUS L. LOUWES

Abstract

A confrontation of the findings of agricultural economics with the actual accomplishments of agricultural policy and behaviour of farmers reveals the existence of a wide gap between economic theory and reality. One of the reasons for this is that a politician is not a homo oeconomicus but a homo politicus who reacts on the premises of various groups from whom he needs or seeks political support. This may divert him from the path of economic rationality shown by agricultural economists. Agriculture economics, on the other hand, has not succeeded in providing adequate explanations for the economic conduct of farmers, particularly with regard to the termination of farms and has tende to neglect the influence of collective actions directed to the protection of their economic position in the short run, preferably by means of the price policy. The author proposes an interdisciplinary approach, based on systems theory, directed to the analysis of the system of agricultural policy and its various sub-systems such as individual farms, farm organizations, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanus L. Louwes, 1973. "Agricultural policy: Banktruptcy of a ‘monodisciplinary’ economic approach," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 1(2), pages 191-212.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:1:y:1973:i:2:p:191-212.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/1.2.191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:1:y:1973:i:2:p:191-212.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.