IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v13y1986i3p327-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Italy: Fragmentation of Policies and Research Effort

Author

Listed:
  • de Benedictus, Michele

Abstract

In Italy, rural development is considered an autonomous area of teaching and research. A major portion of the literature is concerned with the description and interpretation of the regional and intersectoral impact of the postwar development process in Italy, placing substantial emphasis on the analysis of major phenomena and variables involved in this process (diffused versus concentrated industrialization, migration, part-time farming). The absolute lack of coordination among the several measures conceived to promote agricultural and industrial development underlines the absence of an overall policy for rural development. Copyright 1986 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • de Benedictus, Michele, 1986. "Italy: Fragmentation of Policies and Research Effort," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 13(3), pages 327-341.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:13:y:1986:i:3:p:327-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:13:y:1986:i:3:p:327-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.