IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v36y2024i1p85-106..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NGOs Shaping Public Participation Through Law: The Aarhus Convention and Legal Mobilisation

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Abbot
  • Maria Lee

Abstract

This article explores the relative neglect by environmental NGOs—at least until recently—of the middle, public participation, pillar of the Aarhus Convention. This can be seen in litigation, as well as in political advocacy, both domestically and at the international (Aarhus) level. Interviews with some key actors in this area and analysis of published documents provide insights into NGO decision-making. The limits of law become clear—Aarhus rights are made real only through the commitment of governments and civil society. A nuanced combination of internal and external factors contributes to explaining the lack of NGO attention to Aarhus’ middle pillar. We may also see some indications that NGOs envisage participation as a process properly dominated by expertise. This is far from uniform, however, and other parts of the community clearly appreciate and value the significance of lay participation in the environmental arena.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Abbot & Maria Lee, 2024. "NGOs Shaping Public Participation Through Law: The Aarhus Convention and Legal Mobilisation," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 85-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:85-106.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqad030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:85-106.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.