IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/envlaw/v33y2021i1p195-210..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tort to the Environment: A Stretch Too Far or a Simple Step Forward?

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Hook
  • Ceri Warnock
  • Barry Allan
  • Mihiata Pirini

Abstract

This analysis considers the implications of Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd [2020] NZHC 419 and the possibility of a new tort to the environment developing within New Zealand jurisprudence. In Smith, the New Zealand High Court refused to strike out a cause of action based on a new inchoate tort against seven corporations for the damage likely to be caused by their greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), and allowed the matter to proceed to trial. The case raises questions as to whether the time is ripe in New Zealand for the development of a tort to the environment, and whether such a tort could apply to hold private emitters liable for harm caused to the atmosphere by GHGs. In this analysis, we conclude that a duty to protect the environment may be a natural evolution of the New Zealand law of torts and may extend to conduct causing damage to the atmosphere, opening up the possibility of successfully suing corporations for harm to the climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Hook & Ceri Warnock & Barry Allan & Mihiata Pirini, 2021. "Tort to the Environment: A Stretch Too Far or a Simple Step Forward?," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 195-210.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:195-210.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jel/eqaa032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:envlaw:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:195-210.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.