IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v28y2025i1p109-127..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending the scope of instrumental variable methods

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Chesher
  • Adam M Rosen

Abstract

SummarySince Philip Wright’s proposal of the linear instrumental variables (IV) estimator in 1928, the scope of application of IV models has greatly expanded. There are now nonlinear IV models in use with both additive and nonadditive latent variables, employing both semiparametric and nonparametric specifications. A notable feature of Wright’s linear IV estimator is that it is applicable to incomplete models that leave the genesis of endogenous explanatory variables unspecified. However, inversion of the linear model enables the value of unobservable heterogeneity to be expressed as a function of observable variables. Only recently has the application of incomplete IV models been extended to cases in which this inversion produces a non-singleton set of values of unobservable variables. This situation arises in many models such as those featuring discrete choice, counts, or censored outcomes, or when there are multiple sources of heterogeneity as in random coefficient models, or when economic considerations result in inequality restrictions on values taken by observed and unobserved variables. This paper provides an introduction to the methods set out for analysing such generalized instrumental variable models in Chesher and Rosen (2017). An illustrative example is provided in which an outcome is determined by a random coefficients linear model with an endogenous explanatory variable and instrumental variable exclusion and independence restrictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Chesher & Adam M Rosen, 2025. "Extending the scope of instrumental variable methods," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 28(1), pages 109-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:109-127.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utae020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Instrumental variables; identification;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:109-127.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.