IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/emjrnl/v27y2024i2p258-277..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new test for unit roots with a partial quadratic trend

Author

Listed:
  • Yanglin Li
  • Shaoping Wang
  • Sainan Jin
  • Zhijie Xiao

Abstract

SummaryThis paper proposes a new test for unit root processes with a partial quadratic trend on an unknown break date, denoted as the URQ process herein. Such a process is extremely similar to the explosive bubble process, and both can capture the sharp rise in prices. We develop the asymptotic distributions under the local-to-unity hypothesis, which covers the URQ null and explosive root alternatives. Simulations show that the test has good finite sample performances and can differentiate explosive bubble processes from URQ processes. An application to the Kweichow Moutai and Apple stocks, which exhibit striking price rises during their respective sample periods, shows that both prices follow URQ processes. We further provide a fundamental analysis. The significant increases in earnings, returns, dividends, and fundamental score after the partial quadratic trend occurs provide evidence that a fundamental improvement rather than a bubble mainly drives such drastic price rises.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanglin Li & Shaoping Wang & Sainan Jin & Zhijie Xiao, 2024. "A new test for unit roots with a partial quadratic trend," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 27(2), pages 258-277.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:27:y:2024:i:2:p:258-277.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ectj/utad026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:emjrnl:v:27:y:2024:i:2:p:258-277.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.