IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i666p405-429..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity Growth and Workers’ Job Transitions: Evidence from Census Microdata

Author

Listed:
  • Elías Albagli
  • Mario Canales
  • Chad Syverson
  • Matías Tapia
  • Juan Wlasiuk

Abstract

We use administrative data for Chile to provide novel insights on the relationship between job transitions and productivity differentials and quantify how different groups contribute to aggregate reallocation. While on average workers move to more productive firms, almost half of transitions are ‘down the productivity ladder’. Reallocation gains are mostly explained by a narrow subset of transitions: young, high-skilled workers generate the lion’s share of aggregate productivity gains. Workers with high turnover contribute proportionally the least. Therefore, while job reallocation yields a net benefit, it hides massive and heterogeneous gross flows, with many appearing to add little to aggregate efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Elías Albagli & Mario Canales & Chad Syverson & Matías Tapia & Juan Wlasiuk, 2025. "Productivity Growth and Workers’ Job Transitions: Evidence from Census Microdata," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(666), pages 405-429.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:666:p:405-429.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:666:p:405-429.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.