IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i665p235-263..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trading Stocks Builds Financial Confidence and Compresses the Gender Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Saumitra Jha
  • Moses Shayo

Abstract

Many studies document low rates of financial literacy and suboptimal levels of participation in financial markets. These issues are particularly acute among women. Does this reflect a self-reinforcing trap? If so, can a nudge to participate in financial markets generate knowledge, confidence and further increase informed participation? We conduct a large field experiment that enables and incentivises working-age men and women—a challenging group to reach with standard financial training programs—to trade stocks for four to seven weeks. We provide no additional educational content. We find that trading significantly improves financial confidence, as reflected in stock market participation, objective and subjective measures of financial knowledge, and risk tolerance. These effects are especially strong among women. Participants also become more self-reliant and consult others less when making financial decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Saumitra Jha & Moses Shayo, 2025. "Trading Stocks Builds Financial Confidence and Compresses the Gender Gap," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(665), pages 235-263.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:665:p:235-263.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae076
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:665:p:235-263.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.