IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v133y2023i652p1407-1429..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time of Day and High-Stake Cognitive Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Alessio Gaggero
  • Denni Tommasi

Abstract

A variety of external conditions may affect individual performance in high-stake cognitive assessments, with potentially lasting consequences on earnings and career. We provide the first causal evidence that the time of the day is an important condition affecting the performance at the moment of an evaluation. Exploiting a setting in which cognitive assessments are quasi-randomly assigned at a different time of day, we find that peak performance occurs in the early afternoon. The estimated time-of-day effects follow specific patterns consistent with the circadian rhythm, which suggests that biological factors are important determinants of performance even in economically meaningful settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessio Gaggero & Denni Tommasi, 2023. "Time of Day and High-Stake Cognitive Assessments," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(652), pages 1407-1429.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:133:y:2023:i:652:p:1407-1429.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueac090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Anqi & Mattila, Anna S., 2023. "When and how to sell pleasurably painful experiences," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Justine Hervé & Subha Mani & Jere Behrman & Ramanan Laxminarayan, 2024. "Food Coma is Real: The Effect of Digestive Fatigue on Adolescents’ Cognitive Performance," PIER Working Paper Archive 24-011, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:133:y:2023:i:652:p:1407-1429.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.