IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i1p93-109..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modern Slavery and the Punitive–Humanitarian Complex

Author

Listed:
  • Henrique Carvalho
  • Sally Foreman
  • Simon Tawfic
  • Ana Aliverti
  • Anastasia Chamberlen
  • Belinda Rawson

Abstract

This paper provides a critical analysis of modern slavery (MS) policy, legislation and discourse in the United Kingdom. Challenging the suggestion that recent attempts to dilute protections and guarantees in the original MS framework represent a fundamental shift from a more humanitarian to a more punitive orientation, it argues that these two moments ought to be understood as products of a single, underlying articulation, the ‘punitive–humanitarian complex’. We first explore the context and discourse of the MS agenda, exposing an ambivalence within its core tenets, primarily manifested through the dichotomy between victims (slaves) and offenders (slavers). The paper then examines how the punitive–humanitarian complex engenders moral and affective economies and reflects on how it reveals the vulnerability of contemporary state power.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrique Carvalho & Sally Foreman & Simon Tawfic & Ana Aliverti & Anastasia Chamberlen & Belinda Rawson, 2025. "Modern Slavery and the Punitive–Humanitarian Complex," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(1), pages 93-109.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:1:p:93-109.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azae044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:1:p:93-109.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.