IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v65y2025i1p163-181..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Scammers’ Data to Estimate the Impact and Importance of Preventing Repeat Mail Fraud Victimization

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn Langton
  • Marguerite DeLiema
  • Daniel Brannock
  • Edward Preble

Abstract

This study examines the frequency and cost of repeat mail fraud victimization in the United States using longitudinal data from a unique source: records from four scam enterprises that operated over a nearly 20-year period. Findings show that most mail fraud victims experience repeat victimization and a small percentage account for most of the losses. Sixty-two per cent of victims responded to more than one mail solicitation. Chronic victims, who responded more than 20 times, comprised 8.8 per cent of the sample and lost $1,771, on average. Findings suggest the need for early intervention to prevent repeat and chronic victimization, thereby reducing the harm for victims. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn Langton & Marguerite DeLiema & Daniel Brannock & Edward Preble, 2025. "Using Scammers’ Data to Estimate the Impact and Importance of Preventing Repeat Mail Fraud Victimization," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 65(1), pages 163-181.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:1:p:163-181.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azae033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:65:y:2025:i:1:p:163-181.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.