IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v64y2024i5p1211-1227..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Hazardous on My Soul’: (Dis)compassion and Emotive Dissonance in Prison Work

Author

Listed:
  • Ethan M Higgins
  • Justin M Smith
  • Kristin Swartz

Abstract

A history of social research has aimed to illuminate consequences for the psyche of workers that carry out occupations in dehumanizing contexts. In criminology, scholarship has detailed concern over how carceral contexts produce detriment via emotional labour for workers. Although prison work has been shown to necessitate emotional suppression, studies also find workers can bear intimacy for the incarcerated. We contribute to the prison scholarship by illustrating these emotive paradoxes that represent dissonance for staff. We draw from 18 focus groups of staff, to examine how emotive dissonance manifests from contradictory feeling rules in prison work. We explore emotive disharmony among the workgroup that comes from opposing feeling rules, and, we explore how workers experience with emotive dissonance manifests as emotional estrangement. Our findings help contemplate the implications of navigating emotion within dehumanizing contexts and illustrate that how staff treat the incarcerated has implications for their own sense of humanity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ethan M Higgins & Justin M Smith & Kristin Swartz, 2024. "‘Hazardous on My Soul’: (Dis)compassion and Emotive Dissonance in Prison Work," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 64(5), pages 1211-1227.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:5:p:1211-1227.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azae010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:5:p:1211-1227.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.