IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v64y2024i4p964-979..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested, Discounted and Disproven Stories of Rape: The Social Pathways of Rape Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Solveig Laugerud
  • May-Len Skilbrei

Abstract

Tensions between societal and legal norms regarding rape shape people’s perceptions of the law and the use of various legal strategies. This article investigates what happens when a claim of rape is discredited, resulting in the claimant, instead, being prosecuted for presenting a false accusation. Based on the analysis of verdicts in cases of false accusations of rape, we identify four pathways into the criminal justice process for such cases and three turning points whereby an accusation of rape is contested by the police and instead prosecuted as a false accusation. We conclude that this seems to follow from the strength of the ideal that victims of rape are listened to and encouraged to come forward with their claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Solveig Laugerud & May-Len Skilbrei, 2024. "Contested, Discounted and Disproven Stories of Rape: The Social Pathways of Rape Reporting," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 64(4), pages 964-979.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:4:p:964-979.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azad076
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:4:p:964-979.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.