IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v64y2024i1p34-50..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Witnessing (Dis)engagement: A Framework for Examining Legitimacy in the Criminal Courts

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Kirby

Abstract

This paper examines legitimacy in the criminal courts from the perspective of witnesses, an under-researched setting and participant group. Based on interviews with witnesses and observations of court proceedings, the paper provides a framework for examining how witnesses engage with the courts, arguing that ‘engagement’ can be used as a lens through which to understand legitimacy. The findings suggest that witnesses often display weak levels of engagement with the court process, which is indicative of strain in the ongoing legitimacy ‘dialogue’ (Bottoms and Tankebe 2012) between citizens and the state. The implications of this are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Kirby, 2024. "Witnessing (Dis)engagement: A Framework for Examining Legitimacy in the Criminal Courts," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 64(1), pages 34-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:1:p:34-50.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azad009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:1:p:34-50.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.