IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v64y2024i1p229-247..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Did the Prison Industrial Complex Deliver on Its Promise? Prison Proliferation and Employment in Rural America

Author

Listed:
  • Yiwen Zhang

Abstract

Two concurrent phenomena emerged in rural America in the 1970s: job losses due to deindustrialization and prison proliferation relating to mass incarceration. While supporters of the prison industrial complex promised an economic lifeline for rural America, opponents questioned the economic benefits of prison openings. Using county fixed-effects models and data covering 1960–2000, this study reveals a null association between prison openings and total rural employment. While prison proliferation marginally increased government employment, it simultaneously had a negative impact on private employment. Specifically, prison openings were associated with decreased employment in manufacturing, finance and recreational services; and had no impact on jobs in construction, wholesale, and local retail sales. Thus, the promises of employment growth relating to prisons were, overall, not kept.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiwen Zhang, 2024. "Did the Prison Industrial Complex Deliver on Its Promise? Prison Proliferation and Employment in Rural America," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 64(1), pages 229-247.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:1:p:229-247.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azad011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:64:y:2024:i:1:p:229-247.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.