IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v63y2023i1p115-133..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Now with the possibility of parole: Enabling a juvenile lifer’s meaningful review

Author

Listed:
  • Stuti S Kokkalera
  • Simon I Singer

Abstract

Parole is one of the least visible decision-making processes in the criminal justice system. We consider decision statements that support or reject release as symbolic of organizational concerns beyond the candidate’s individual attributes. To draw out the symbolic, we focus on decision statements issued to 33 juvenile lifers previously ineligible for parole. We find that what is meaningful to a parole board is highly selective, and there is no generalized presumption of mitigated culpability and capacity for rehabilitation. Rather release is justified based on childhood abuse, peer dependency and a redemptive self. In contrast, denying narratives selectively highlight the seriousness of the sentencing offence by focusing on the ‘horrific,’ and the retributive requirement for more time to be served.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuti S Kokkalera & Simon I Singer, 2023. "Now with the possibility of parole: Enabling a juvenile lifer’s meaningful review," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 115-133.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:63:y:2023:i:1:p:115-133.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azac001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:63:y:2023:i:1:p:115-133.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.