IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i5p1270-1288..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Law-And-Order Politics Fail: Media Fragmentation and Protective Factors That Limit the Politics of Fear

Author

Listed:
  • Murray Lee
  • Justin R Ellis
  • Chloe Keel
  • Rebecca Wickes
  • Jonathan Jackson

Abstract

Law-and-order politics has long been a topic of scholarly work. The leveraging of fear of crime for political capital has been of particular concern. In the 2018 election in the Australian state of Victoria, crime and law-and-order became prominent political issues, particularly through racialized discourse about ‘African gangs’. That election provides a case study here. This article turns the traditional analysis of the politics of fear of crime around and considers some of the key reasons why law-and-order politics failed to gain decisive political traction in this instance. Media fragmentation and diversification continues to challenge the primacy of political primary definers in unpredictable ways. As such, electoral strategies that seek to leverage fear of crime and community insecurity need to be understood in the context of broader individual, community and social protective factors that might mitigate fear of crime.

Suggested Citation

  • Murray Lee & Justin R Ellis & Chloe Keel & Rebecca Wickes & Jonathan Jackson, 2022. "When Law-And-Order Politics Fail: Media Fragmentation and Protective Factors That Limit the Politics of Fear," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(5), pages 1270-1288.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:5:p:1270-1288.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azac038
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terance D. Miethe, 1995. "Fear and Withdrawal from Urban Life," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 539(1), pages 14-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:5:p:1270-1288.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.