IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i3p734-750..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techniques To Exploit Vulnerabilities: Persuasion And Education In Chinese Police Interrogations

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Mou

Abstract

Drawing upon in-depth interviews with frontline police officers, this article examines persuasion and education as a psychological interrogation method routinely applied in Chinese police questioning. It analyses the three tactics employed by the interrogators in inducing the suspect to confess, including utilization of suspects’ personal relationships, their hope for the uncertain future and memories of past experiences. These mechanisms correspond to the three forms of universal vulnerability shared by human beings, namely the individuals’ susceptibility to human dependency, the predicament of irreversibility and uncertainty about the future. This article analyses the ways in which vulnerability as a universal human condition can be exploited by state coercion, and how this coercion produces the moral vulnerability of police.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Mou, 2022. "Techniques To Exploit Vulnerabilities: Persuasion And Education In Chinese Police Interrogations," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(3), pages 734-750.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:3:p:734-750.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:3:p:734-750.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.