IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i2p413-430..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ignored but not Forgotten: The Broken Windows Tipping Point and the Question of Functional Form

Author

Listed:
  • Alaina De Biasi

Abstract

Wilson and Kelling provide a simple instruction to address disorder: direct limited police resources to neighbourhoods at the tipping point. In doing so, they suggest that the disorder–crime relationship reflects a threshold effect. A proper test of the validity of broken windows theory should, therefore, accommodate nonlinearity. To this end, this study empirically examines the functional form of the relationship between physical disorder and violent crime rate in Detroit, MI, utilizing a dose–response propensity score methodology. This examination is aided by open-sourced data collected at the census block-group level. Findings support a nonlinear relationship, favouring a threshold effect with two caveats. Several directions for future research are explored, as well as implications for theory, practice and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaina De Biasi, 2022. "Ignored but not Forgotten: The Broken Windows Tipping Point and the Question of Functional Form," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(2), pages 413-430.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:2:p:413-430.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:2:p:413-430.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.