IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i6p1521-1539..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Securitizing the Colour Revolution: Assessing the Political Role of Triads in Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement
[‘Criminal Politics: An Integrated Approach to the Study of Organized Crime, Politics, and Violence’]

Author

Listed:
  • T Wing Lo
  • Sharon Ingrid Kwok
  • Daniel Garrett

Abstract

In Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement, the use of Chinese triads to attack protestors has attracted international attention, forcing the regime to constrain further acts of grand illegitimate violence. Research suggests that triads were used as ‘thugs-for-hire’ by the regime to achieve political ends. The present study aims to examine why the triads were hired and what their specific roles and motivations were. It concludes that triads acted as non-state securitization actors, agent provocateurs or extralegal protectors depending on several factors, such as financial incentives, being stakeholders in occupied sites, business interests in mainland China and individuals’ political ideology. It suggests that triads were used as vigilantes against the threats of Western-instigated Color Revolution and hybrid warfare targeting China.

Suggested Citation

  • T Wing Lo & Sharon Ingrid Kwok & Daniel Garrett, 2021. "Securitizing the Colour Revolution: Assessing the Political Role of Triads in Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement [‘Criminal Politics: An Integrated Approach to the Study of Organized Crime, Politics, an," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(6), pages 1521-1539.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:6:p:1521-1539.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:6:p:1521-1539.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.