IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i6p1452-1468..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Segregation Seekers: an Alternative Perspective on the Solitary Confinement Debate
[‘Fortress UK? Gated Communities, the Spatial Revolt of the Elites and Time–Space Trajectories of Segregation’]

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Laws

Abstract

Recent calls from senior managers, human rights groups and academics continue to scrutinize the impact of solitary confinement. But much less attention has been paid to prisoners’ own motivations for segregation. By analysing interviews with 16 segregated men in a high-security prison (Category-A) in England, this article foregrounds motivation. The argument involves a detailed description of the complex, and sometimes contradictory, motives that may lead prisoners into seeking isolation. It further attempts to explore the relationship between segregation and the wider prison environment. For many prisoners, segregation has a ‘negative benefit’ or amounts to a form of ‘lesser evil’. Such phrasing hints at the difficult decisions that prisoners navigate and offers an alternative perspective on solitary confinement.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Laws, 2021. "Segregation Seekers: an Alternative Perspective on the Solitary Confinement Debate [‘Fortress UK? Gated Communities, the Spatial Revolt of the Elites and Time–Space Trajectories of Segregation’]," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(6), pages 1452-1468.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:6:p:1452-1468.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wright, Kevin A. & Young, Jacob T.N. & Matekel, Caitlin G. & Infante, Arynn A. & Gifford, Faith E. & Meyers, Travis J. & Morse, Stephanie J., 2023. "Solitary confinement and the well-being of people in prison," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:6:p:1452-1468.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.