IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i5p1390-1406..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The policing of cuckooing in ‘County Lines’ drug dealing: An ethnographic study of an amplification spiral
[‘“Ethnobotanicals” and “Spice Zombies”: New Psychoactive Substances in the Mainstream Media’]

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Spicer

Abstract

Responding to cases of ‘cuckooing’, where drug dealers take over other people’s homes, has become a significant policing activity in the United Kingdom. Drawing on ethnographic data and the deviancy amplification spiral model, this article theorizes how police responses to cuckooing emerged, developed and became established. Five stages of the spiral are outlined: identifying cuckooing as a problem; demonstrating a response; spreading the problem; making it other people’s problem too; the establishment of a policing priority. The article advances amplification theory by considering it from within the setting of the police and the contemporary drug supply context of County Lines. It concludes by stressing the importance of critically considering the dynamic relationship between the police and their drug market targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Spicer, 2021. "The policing of cuckooing in ‘County Lines’ drug dealing: An ethnographic study of an amplification spiral [‘“Ethnobotanicals” and “Spice Zombies”: New Psychoactive Substances in the Mainstream Med," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(5), pages 1390-1406.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1390-1406.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1390-1406.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.