IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i5p1354-1371..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gendered prisons, relationships and resettlement policies; three reasons for caution for imprisoned mothers
[‘Is Motherhood Important? Imprisoned Women’s Maternal Experiences Before and During Confinement and Their Post-release Expectations’]

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Booth

Abstract

Drawing on the lived experiences and perceptions of five imprisoned mothers, this article critically explores female prisons, relationships and resettlement policies in England and Wales. The findings indicate how the infusing of gendered, informal social controls into penal interventions and penal policy has the potential to harm mothers. This is why three reasons for caution are proposed in relation to ‘structural obstacles’, ‘continued exposure to abuse’ and ‘ascribed reputations’. With these challenges, the mother’s aspirations for a crime- and drug-free future may be thwarted. Therefore, by showing the complex and dynamic set of circumstances that mothers in prison must navigate, more clearly, the need for a nuanced approach for working with women can be appreciated.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Booth, 2021. "Gendered prisons, relationships and resettlement policies; three reasons for caution for imprisoned mothers [‘Is Motherhood Important? Imprisoned Women’s Maternal Experiences Before and During Conf," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(5), pages 1354-1371.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1354-1371.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1354-1371.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.