IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i5p1334-1353..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nested complex crime: Assessing the convergence of wildlife trafficking, organized crime and loose criminal networks
[‘Wildlife Trafficking between the European Union and Mexico’]

Author

Listed:
  • William D Moreto
  • Daan P Van Uhm

Abstract

Wildlife trafficking is considered to be an example of a transnational organized crime by policymakers and enforcement agencies. Empirically, however, there is mixed support for this. Recently, there has been increased attention on the convergence of different illegal activities in an effort to share resources, personnel and transport routes. The present study attempts to qualitatively examine the intersection of wildlife trafficking and organized crime from a crime mutualism framework in order to explore how these criminal activities and entities converge. Based on fieldwork conducted in Uganda and China, we find that while organized crime appears to have a presence in illegal wildlife markets, such involvement appears to be more relevant during specific stages. Furthermore, it appears that illegal wildlife markets in both case studies reflect both loose, informal criminal networks and more organized crime groups. These findings have implications for the criminological study of and the response to complex wildlife crime.

Suggested Citation

  • William D Moreto & Daan P Van Uhm, 2021. "Nested complex crime: Assessing the convergence of wildlife trafficking, organized crime and loose criminal networks [‘Wildlife Trafficking between the European Union and Mexico’]," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(5), pages 1334-1353.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1334-1353.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1334-1353.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.