IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i5p1316-1333..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unemployment and crime: Experimental evidence of the causal effects of intensified ALMPs on crime rates among unemployed individuals
[‘Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency’]

Author

Listed:
  • Signe Hald Andersen

Abstract

Previous studies investigate whether levels of welfare benefits reduce crime among the unemployed. The current paper expands this literature by testing whether the intensity of other welfare programs aimed at the unemployed affects their criminal activity. For this purpose, the study uses evidence from a Danish social experiment that randomly assigned active labour market programs (ALMPs) of different intensity to newly unemployed individuals (N = 4.710, 41.7 per cent women). Using a negative binomial model, I find that the experiment significantly reduced the number of criminal convictions from 61 in the control group to 43 among the treated. While this 40 per cent decrease reflects a numerically small effect, the results still indicate that the intensity of ALMPs affects criminal behaviour among the unemployed.

Suggested Citation

  • Signe Hald Andersen, 2021. "Unemployment and crime: Experimental evidence of the causal effects of intensified ALMPs on crime rates among unemployed individuals [‘Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquenc," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(5), pages 1316-1333.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1316-1333.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:5:p:1316-1333.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.