IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i3p792-811..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constituting Child-to-Parent Violence: Lessons from England and Wales
[‘Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible’]

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Holt
  • Sam Lewis

Abstract

This paper draws upon the first national study of local responses to child-to-parent violence (CPV) in England and Wales to examine emergent representations of CPV and consider their implications for children and families. Central amongst these is the Government’s depiction of CPV as a form of ‘domestic violence and abuse’. For many individuals and organizations, that term is synonymous with intimate partner violence. We contend that the resulting conflation of (and confusion between) violence by intimate partners, and by children, towards women is producing dominant representations of CPV that may have negative consequences for families. Our research with over 200 practitioners reveals the existence of subjugated knowledges of CPV, however, that provide pockets of resistance to these dominant representations.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Holt & Sam Lewis, 2021. "Constituting Child-to-Parent Violence: Lessons from England and Wales [‘Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible’]," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(3), pages 792-811.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:3:p:792-811.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaa088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:3:p:792-811.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.