IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i2p497-518..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of terrorist incidents on public worry of future attacks, views of the police and social cohesion
[‘Contesting the New York Community: From Liminality to the “New Normal” in the Wake of September 11’]

Author

Listed:
  • Liam Fenn
  • Ian Brunton-Smith

Abstract

Despite a growing body of research examining the psychological effects of terrorist incidents, there remains comparatively little empirical assessment of their impacts on citizens’ worry about further attacks, perceptions of the police or social cohesion. Drawing on interviews with nearly 100,000 London residents, we find higher levels of worry following most domestic attacks. Improvements in overall ratings of the police are tempered by more negative assessments of their ability to handle future threats. We also find that far-right incidents are less closely linked to changes in public ratings of the police and concerns about future attacks compared to Islamic terror attacks. Effects on social cohesion are less predictable. We find reductions in cohesion following some attacks but increases following others.

Suggested Citation

  • Liam Fenn & Ian Brunton-Smith, 2021. "The effects of terrorist incidents on public worry of future attacks, views of the police and social cohesion [‘Contesting the New York Community: From Liminality to the “New Normal” in the Wake of," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(2), pages 497-518.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:2:p:497-518.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaa070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:2:p:497-518.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.