IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i2p456-475..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resistance and reproduction: an arts-based investigation into young people’s emotional responses to crime
[‘Safety, Fear and Belonging: The Everyday Realities of Civic Identity Formation in Fenham, Newcastle upon Tyne’]

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Dodsley
  • Emily Gray

Abstract

This paper reports on a qualitative study of young people’s emotional responses to crime, underpinned by cultural criminology and interpretive phenomenology. It uses alternative approaches to explore young people’s ‘fears’ of crime via the use of arts-based methods, specifically performative drama and focus groups. The rationale is rooted in young people’s voices being largely absent from fear of crime research and the increased movement towards a more creative and less prescriptive criminology. The findings point towards the value of such approaches and argue that young people’s emotions about crime become highly gendered and age-relevant in youth and have multiple, overlapping spheres that are culturally constructed, resisted and reproduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Dodsley & Emily Gray, 2021. "Resistance and reproduction: an arts-based investigation into young people’s emotional responses to crime [‘Safety, Fear and Belonging: The Everyday Realities of Civic Identity Formation in Fenham,," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(2), pages 456-475.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:2:p:456-475.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaa063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:2:p:456-475.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.