IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i1p41-60..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where two ‘exceptional’ prison cultures meet: Negotiating order in a transnational prison
[‘“Crimmigrant” Bodies and Bona Fide Travelers: Surveillance, Citizenship and Global Governance’]

Author

Listed:
  • Alison Liebling
  • Berit Johnsen
  • Bethany E Schmidt
  • Tore Rokkan
  • Kristel Beyens
  • Miranda Boone
  • Mieke Kox
  • An-Sofie Vanhouche

Abstract

Can a prison in the Netherlands, that is neither ‘Dutch’ nor ‘Norwegian’, be ‘legitimate?’ What are the moral challenges? Our study of the controversial Norgerhaven project—a Norwegian prison located in the Netherlands—found that this ‘experiment’ generated one of the most reflexive, ‘deliberative’ prisons we have encountered. Officials involved in the decision assumed that the two jurisdictions were alike in their values. Few were prepared for the differences that arose. This hybrid prison made punishment, the use of authority, and the meanings of fairness, professionalism and discipline unusually explicit as staff negotiated their practices, creating a shift from ‘practical’ to ‘discursive’ consciousness and exposing many of the complexities of liberal penal power.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison Liebling & Berit Johnsen & Bethany E Schmidt & Tore Rokkan & Kristel Beyens & Miranda Boone & Mieke Kox & An-Sofie Vanhouche, 2021. "Where two ‘exceptional’ prison cultures meet: Negotiating order in a transnational prison [‘“Crimmigrant” Bodies and Bona Fide Travelers: Surveillance, Citizenship and Global Governance’]," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(1), pages 41-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:41-60.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaa047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:41-60.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.