IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v61y2021i1p22-40..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drug Control Policy, Normalization, and Symbolic Boundaries in Amsterdam’s Coffee Shops
[The Rationality of Sexual Offending: Testing a Deterrence/rational Choice Conception of Sexual Assault’]

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Dickinson
  • Scott Jacques

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between drug control policy, normalization and symbolic boundary work among drug traders. Taking from interviews with 50 personnel in Amsterdam’s coffee shops, we find that Dutch drug policy shapes their understanding of what comprises morally acceptable drug use and sales. Conversely, the rules set by the state also guide personnel’s definitions of what is morally unacceptable: using hard drugs or committing predatory crimes. To normalize their own involvement with cannabis, personnel must identify potential rule breakers and criminals. To do so, they construct symbolic boundaries differentiating themselves from these persons. We conclude by discussing the theoretical implications of our findings for normalization and symbolic boundaries and by suggesting a potential negative secondary impact of cannabis decriminalization or legalization: the further marginalization of hard drug users.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Dickinson & Scott Jacques, 2021. "Drug Control Policy, Normalization, and Symbolic Boundaries in Amsterdam’s Coffee Shops [The Rationality of Sexual Offending: Testing a Deterrence/rational Choice Conception of Sexual Assault’]," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(1), pages 22-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:22-40.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azaa059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:61:y:2021:i:1:p:22-40.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.