IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v60y2020i2p444-467..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where’s the Crime? Exploring Divergences Between Call Data and Perceptions of Local Crime

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren C Porter
  • Andrew Curtis
  • Eric Jefferis
  • Susanne Mitchell

Abstract

Scholars typically use calls to the police to study crime patterning; however, crime reporting may be systematic across space. Using spatial video and geonarrative methodology, we investigate the overlap between perceived crime hot spots among 35 neighbourhood insiders (police officers, ex-offenders and residents) and hot spots gleaned from call data. In general, perceptual hot spots diverge from call data, but in particular, a corner store emerges as a perceptual hot spot across all groups, but not in call data. We use our data to explore the microgeographic dynamics of this ‘hidden hot spot’. We find that the corner store is relatively isolated, with few occupied residences around it and participants avoiding it. In addition, our geonarratives suggest that the store lacks adequate guardianship. We argue that mixed methodological approaches such as these are useful for understanding discrepancies between measures as well as the situational and environmental dynamics of problem places.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren C Porter & Andrew Curtis & Eric Jefferis & Susanne Mitchell, 2020. "Where’s the Crime? Exploring Divergences Between Call Data and Perceptions of Local Crime," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 60(2), pages 444-467.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:60:y:2020:i:2:p:444-467.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azz059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:60:y:2020:i:2:p:444-467.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.