IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v43y2024i1p1-20..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Victoria Chick (1936–2023), a Restless Challenger to Mainstream Economics: An Appreciation

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Cristina Marcuzzo
  • Constantinos Repapis
  • Jan Toporowski

Abstract

In this article on Victoria (Vicky) Chick (1936–2023), we intend to cover the main research areas into which Chick devoted her life’s work. We categorise the contributions into three broad fields. First, her work on Keynes’s General Theory and the message that economists have taken from it since its publication. Chick wrote extensively on the many misinterpretations of the General Theory that have clouded its message. Instead, through her writings, she offered an alternative perspective and interpretative line that became central to the post-Keynesian school of thought. Second, her work on Keynes gave her the starting point for her novel understanding on the monetary nature of the economy and was the inspiration in the development of the banking stages of history approach that shows the evolutionary nature of banking theory and practice. Finally, the way in which The General Theory built its argument and the misinterpretation that many mainstream economists took from it led Chick to develop her methodological approach on open and closed systems of analysis and the importance of developing judgement as part of teaching in economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Cristina Marcuzzo & Constantinos Repapis & Jan Toporowski, 2024. "Victoria Chick (1936–2023), a Restless Challenger to Mainstream Economics: An Appreciation," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(1), pages 1-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:43:y:2024:i:1:p:1-20.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzae002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:43:y:2024:i:1:p:1-20.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.