IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v42y2023i1p192-225..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

J.M. Keynes’ Tract on Monetary Reform (1923) After 100 Years—A Retrospective

Author

Listed:
  • Jörg Bibow

Abstract

This article revisits the main themes and theories that Keynes presented in the Tract on Monetary Reform one hundred years ago. It argues that the Tract remains highly relevant today for mainly three reasons. First, the Tract remains relevant as one of the four major monetary works that represent the evolution of Keynes’ monetary thought. Second, the Tract contains theories that were and continue to be important in their own right, especially since they may not have received any attention in the General Theory. Third, the Tract developed policy ideas and proposals that describe common practices of central banks around the world today. In fact, one hundred years later, it is fair to say that modern civilization includes Keynes’ mantra of the Tract as one of its tenets: that a managed currency is inevitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Jörg Bibow, 2023. "J.M. Keynes’ Tract on Monetary Reform (1923) After 100 Years—A Retrospective," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(1), pages 192-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:42:y:2023:i:1:p:192-225.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzad020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:42:y:2023:i:1:p:192-225.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.