IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v37y2018i1p105-131..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘Bellial Des Vertus’ Enigma And The Beginnings Of Physiocracy

Author

Listed:
  • PIERRE LE MASNE
  • GABRIEL SABBAGH

Abstract

In an important work written in 1759, Quesnay quoted twice a book authored by a ‘Bellial des Vertus’ and published in 1759, Essai sur l’administration des terres (EAT). We prove that these quotations are of fundamental importance for the Physiocratic doctrine. We show that EAT was essentially written in 1754–1755, when Physiocracy did not yet exist. A detailed study of EAT and of the works of Quesnay and of Charles Richard de Butré, Quesnay’s disciple and collaborator, leads us to suggest that Quesnay was influenced by EAT before its publication, and to believe that Butré was the author of EAT. The attribution of EAT to Butré rests on a great variety of arguments and has allowed us to identify other texts by Butré, and to better grasp the publishing practices of the Physiocratic journals in the 1760s. The paper revisits the beginnings of Physiocracy and improves our knowledge of Butré.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Le Masne & Gabriel Sabbagh, 2018. "The ‘Bellial Des Vertus’ Enigma And The Beginnings Of Physiocracy," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(1), pages 105-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:37:y:2018:i:1:p:105-131.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzy006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:37:y:2018:i:1:p:105-131.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.