IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v6y2013i3p479-500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The everyday geographies of financialisation: impacts, subjects and alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Stacey Coppock

Abstract

This article develops an empirically rich and geographically sympathetic account of the lived experiences of financialisation and its impacts on individuals and households within rural England. The study adopts a financial ecologies approach to demonstrate how the contemporary landscape of both mainstream finance and alternative-and-diverse economic networks are geographically variegated; creating distinct spaces of financial inclusion and exclusion. It examines the everyday engagement of 17 rural households with financial services to argue that financial subjects inhabit multiple subject positions within a financial ecology in ways that conform, diverge and subvert neoliberal versions of the responsible, financially self-disciplined individual. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacey Coppock, 2013. "The everyday geographies of financialisation: impacts, subjects and alternatives," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(3), pages 479-500.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:6:y:2013:i:3:p:479-500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rst012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincent Guermond, 2022. "Contesting the financialisation of remittances: Repertoires of reluctance, refusal and dissent in Ghana and Senegal," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 800-821, June.
    2. Ariane Agunsoye, 2021. "‘Locked in the Rat Race’: Variegated financial subjectivities in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1828-1848, October.
    3. Marta Gancarczyk & Óscar Rodil-Marzábal, 2022. "Fintech framing financial ecologies: Conceptual and policy-related implications," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(4), pages 7-44.
    4. Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso & Javier Jorge-Vazquez & Miguel Ángel Echarte Fernández & Konrad Kolegowicz & Wojciech Szymla, 2022. "Financial Exclusion in Rural and Urban Contexts in Poland: A Threat to Achieving SDG Eight?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Caleb Gallemore & Kristian Roed Nielsen & Kristjan Jespersen, 2019. "The uneven geography of crowdfunding success: Spatial capital on Indiegogo," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(6), pages 1389-1406, September.
    6. Oddný Helgadóttir, 2023. "The new luxury freeports: Offshore storage, tax avoidance, and ‘invisible’ art," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 1020-1040, June.
    7. Léna Pellandini-Simányi & Adam Banai, 2021. "Reluctant financialisaton: Financialisaton without financialised subjectivities in Hungary and the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 785-808, June.
    8. Nicola Livingstone & Nick Gallent & Iqbal Hamiduddin & Meri Juntti & Phoebe Stirling, 2021. "Beyond Agriculture: Alternative Geographies of Rural Land Investment and Place Effects across the United Kingdom," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Paul Langley & Andrew Leyshon, 2017. "Capitalizing on the crowd: The monetary and financial ecologies of crowdfunding," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1019-1039, May.
    10. Felicia HM Liu & Karen PY Lai, 2021. "Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(8), pages 1896-1914, November.
    11. Ariane Hillig, 2019. "Everyday financialization: The case of UK households," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1460-1478, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:6:y:2013:i:3:p:479-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.