IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v12y2019i3p385-399..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A developmental network city? Double embeddedness in New York

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Indergaard

Abstract

This article develops the concept of the “developmental network city” (DNC) to link the literatures on neo-developmental states and urban economic innovation. Applying the developmental network state (DNS) model to the case of New York City, it shows how the American DNS contributed to the rise of a New York DNC, which features localised discovery and governance. Most important here was that New York’s developmental agencies created a knowledge economy alternative to the “global financial centre” path by selectively adapting DNS ideas and resources to fit the city’s landscape of applied innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Indergaard, 2019. "A developmental network city? Double embeddedness in New York," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(3), pages 385-399.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:385-399.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsz013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Gancarczyk & Marta Najda-Janoszka & Jacek Gancarczyk & Robert Hassink, 2021. "Exploring Regional Innovation Policies and Regional Industrial Transformation from a Co-Evolutionary Perspective: The Case of Małopolska, Poland," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_03, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    2. Sharon Zukin, 2021. "Planetary Silicon Valley: Deconstructing New York’s innovation complex," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 3-35, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:385-399.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.