IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v12y2019i3p369-384..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities and risks of localised industrial policy: the case of “maker-entrepreneurial ecosystems” in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Greg Schrock
  • Laura Wolf-Powers

Abstract

Efforts in US cities to support the emergence of the “maker economy” could take urban-level industrial policy in a new direction. Optimistic projections about the potential of the maker economy for urban manufacturing revitalisation, however, downplay an enduring tension in local economic development between efforts to build endogenous capabilities and pressures to facilitate property value growth. Exploring maker industrial policy efforts in New York City and Portland, Oregon, we argue that local government actors often struggle to build network capacity and curb opportunism. District-based models hold promise, but the real estate-driven model of local development poses a persistent challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Greg Schrock & Laura Wolf-Powers, 2019. "Opportunities and risks of localised industrial policy: the case of “maker-entrepreneurial ecosystems” in the USA," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(3), pages 369-384.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:369-384.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsz014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Declan Martin & Carl Grodach, 2023. "RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION IN GENTRIFYING URBAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS: The Experience of Cultural Manufacturers in San Francisco and Melbourne," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 625-644, July.
    2. Marta Gancarczyk & Marta Najda-Janoszka & Jacek Gancarczyk & Robert Hassink, 2021. "Exploring Regional Innovation Policies and Regional Industrial Transformation from a Co-Evolutionary Perspective: The Case of Małopolska, Poland," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_03, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    3. Tanya Tsui & David Peck & Bob Geldermans & Arjan van Timmeren, 2020. "The Role of Urban Manufacturing for a Circular Economy in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Siyu Chen & Jian Lin, 2021. "Making with Shenzhen (Characteristics)—Strategy and Everyday Tactics in a City’s Creative Turn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Allison Bramwell, 2021. "Inclusive innovation and the “ordinary†city: Incidental or integral?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 242-264, May.
    6. Nurzhanat Sherimova & Baurzhan Isabekov & Miras Alkeev & Zhanna Yermekova & Tatyana Ostryanina, 2022. "An analytical assessment of industrial sector innovative management in the context of digitalization," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Tara Vinodrai & Brenton Nader & Christian Zavarella, 2021. "Manufacturing space for inclusive innovation? A study of makerspaces in southern Ontario," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 205-223, May.
    8. Sharon Zukin, 2021. "Planetary Silicon Valley: Deconstructing New York’s innovation complex," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 3-35, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:369-384.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.