IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v11y2018i3p587-608..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The crisis as opportunity? On the role of the Troika in constructing the European consolidation state

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Clifton
  • Daniel Diaz-Fuentes
  • Ana Lara Gómez

Abstract

The 2008 financial crisis has been seen as providing an opportunity for core eurozone members to push neoliberal policies onto the periphery in order to construct a European consolidation state. We adapt a policy transfer model to examine the extent to which the Troika transferred neoliberal policy onto Greece and Ireland. The size of the ideological gap between Troika policies and those embedded in the peripheral country was crucial when explaining why the Troika’s policies were more brutal, intrusive and long-lasting in Greece than in Ireland, and why Greece proved more resilient to attempts to transfer policy than Ireland.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Clifton & Daniel Diaz-Fuentes & Ana Lara Gómez, 2018. "The crisis as opportunity? On the role of the Troika in constructing the European consolidation state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 587-608.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:587-608.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsy021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James D G Wood & Valentina Ausserladscheider & Matthew Sparkes, 2023. "The manufactured crisis of COVID-Keynesianism in Britain, Germany and the USA," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 19-29.
    2. Lampropoulou, Manto, 2021. "Public-sector reform: Lessons from the privatisation experiment in Greece," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Yunji Kim & Austin M Aldag & Mildred E Warner, 2021. "Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1158-1175, May.
    4. Albert Sanghoon Park, 2023. "Building resilience knowledge for sustainable development: Insights from development studies," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-33, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Austin M Aldag & Yunji Kim & Mildred E Warner, 2019. "Austerity urbanism or pragmatic municipalism? Local government responses to fiscal stress in New York State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(6), pages 1287-1305, September.
    6. Cheliotis, Leonidas & Xenakis, Sappho, 2020. "What's left? Political orientation, economic conditions, and incarceration in Greece under Syriza-led government," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106295, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Stavros P. Migkos & Damianos P. Sakas & Nikolaos T. Giannakopoulos & Georgios Konteos & Anastasia Metsiou, 2022. "Analyzing Greece 2010 Memorandum’s Impact on Macroeconomic and Financial Figures through FCM," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Canale, Rosaria Rita & De Simone, Elina & Spagnolo, Nicola, 2021. "Financial markets and fiscal discipline in the Eurozone," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 490-499.
    9. Almeida, Renan P. & Hungaro, Lucas, 2021. "Water and sanitation governance between austerity and financialization," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Julio Revuelta, 2021. "The Effects of the Economic Adjustment Programmes for Greece: A Quasi-Experimental Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:587-608.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.