IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v11y2018i2p241-255..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From success to failure, the disappearance of clusters: a study of a Norwegian boat-building cluster

Author

Listed:
  • Arne Isaksen

Abstract

The article analyses the decline and disappearance of regional clusters, with an empirical investigation of why a boat-building cluster in Norway failed after the 2008 financial crisis. The article combines insights into lock-in processes that take place at the cluster and regional innovation system level with lock-in processes at the entrepreneur and firm level. The latter level focuses on the development of local conventions of how production activities should occur as a potential key lock-in process. The failure of the boat-building cluster is explained by a convention supporting artisan craft production and little support from the regional innovation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Arne Isaksen, 2018. "From success to failure, the disappearance of clusters: a study of a Norwegian boat-building cluster," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(2), pages 241-255.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:2:p:241-255.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsy007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johan Miörner, 2019. "Contextualizing system agency in new path development: What factors shape regional reconfiguration capacity?," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_13, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    2. Vitor Klein Schmidt & Aurora Carneiro Zen & Bernardo Fernandes Soares & Bruno Anicet Bittencourt, 2023. "Trajectory and cluster resilience elements: The case of the Brazilian wine cluster of the Serra Gaúcha," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 596-624, June.
    3. Bonnín Roca, Jaime & Vaishnav, Parth & Morgan, Granger M. & Fuchs, Erica & Mendonça, Joana, 2021. "Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Geetika Jain & Archana Shrivastava & Justin Paul & Ronak Batra, 2022. "Blockchain for SME Clusters: An Ideation using the Framework of Ostrom Commons Governance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1125-1143, August.
    5. Robert Hassink & Arne Isaksen & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(11), pages 1636-1645, November.
    6. Tobias König, 2023. "Between collaboration and competition: co‐located clusters of different industries in one region—the context of Tuttlingen's medical engineering and metal processing industries," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 288-325, April.
    7. Stephanie Scott & Mathew Hughes & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2022. "Towards a network-based view of effective entrepreneurial ecosystems," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 157-187, January.
    8. Jiří Blažek & Viktor Květoň & Simon Baumgartinger-Seiringer & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "The dark side of regional industrial path development: towards a typology of trajectories of decline," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_08, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    9. Nina Kyllingstad, 2021. "Overcoming barriers to new regional industrial path development: The role of a centre for research‐based innovation," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1312-1329, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:2:p:241-255.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.