IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v10y2017i2p297-310..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharing as a postwork style: digital work and the co-working office

Author

Listed:
  • Lizzie Richardson

Abstract

Evocations of the ‘sharing economy’ claim disruptions through digital technology. Style is put forward to focus on subtle changes to the form and content of work through digital sharing. Digital sharing is a postwork style with ambiguous implications for worker identity and expression. Digital technologies share work through distributing the workplace beyond a fixed location and by enrolling individuals as workers through processes of communication circulation. These styles of sharing challenge fixed spaces and times of work with utopian and dystopian postwork possibilities. This argument is supported through practices of shared digital work constituting co-working offices in Manchester, Cambridge and London.

Suggested Citation

  • Lizzie Richardson, 2017. "Sharing as a postwork style: digital work and the co-working office," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(2), pages 297-310.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:297-310.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsx002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jennifer Johns & Sarah Marie Hall, 2020. "‘I have so little time […] I got shit I need to do’: Critical perspectives on making and sharing in Manchester’s FabLab," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1292-1312, October.
    2. Yi, Ming & Liu, Yafen & Sheng, Mingyue Selena & Wen, Le, 2022. "Effects of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: New evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    4. Massimiliano Tabusi, 2021. "Plusvalore geografico, (cyber)spazio e lavoro," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 13-29.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sharing; digital work; co-working; postwork; style;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J - Labor and Demographic Economics
    • O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth
    • R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:297-310.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.