IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cesifo/v50y2004i1p133-170..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

All About the Giants: Probing the Influences on World Growth and Income Inequality at the End of the 20th Century

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Berry
  • John Serieux

Abstract

This paper presents estimates of world output growth from 1970 to 2000, the distribution of income among countries and persons for the years 1980, 1990 and 2000, and world income poverty rates for the same years. It also presents the results of a series of simulation exercises that attempt to isolate the effect of particular country and regional experiences on world output growth and changes in global income inequality and poverty. The authors find that rapid growth in China (despite a downward adjustment of official growth estimates) had a powerful impact on the growth of world output in both the 1980s and 1990s, but that negative economic growth in Eastern Europe more than offset that effect in the 1990s. With respect to the distribution of world income between countries, the impressive growth performances of the worlds most populous countries, China and India, ensured decreasing levels of inequality during both the 1980s and 1990s. When the distribution of world income between persons is measured, the equalizing effect of China's rapid growth remains dominant through both the 1980s and 1990s, despite the contradictory impact of increasing domestic inequality. Only India's influence remained substantial by comparison. Other identifiable events of the period, such as the economic contraction in Eastern Europe and continued economic decline in Africa, had little statistical impact. However, when the combined influence of China and India's above-average growth rates is removed, or their size effect dampened, the improving global distribution of (inter-country and inter-personal) income suggested by all statistical measures becomes one of sharply worsening inequality. The impact of these two countries is similarly critical with respect to global poverty reduction. (JEL F0, I3, O4)

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Berry & John Serieux, 2004. "All About the Giants: Probing the Influences on World Growth and Income Inequality at the End of the 20th Century," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 50(1), pages 133-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:50:y:2004:i:1:p:133-170.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cesifo/50.1.133
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward, Peter, 2006. "Examining Inequality: Who Really Benefits from Global Growth?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1667-1695, October.
    2. José Antonio Ocampo & María Angela Parra, 2007. "The Dual Divergence: Growth Successes and Collapses in the Developing World Since 1980," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Ricardo Ffrench-Davis & José Luis Machinea (ed.), Economic Growth with Equity, chapter 4, pages 61-92, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Camelia Minoiu & Sanjay G. Reddy, 2008. "Chinese Poverty: Assessing The Impact Of Alternative Assumptions," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 54(4), pages 572-596, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F0 - International Economics - - General
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:50:y:2004:i:1:p:133-170.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.