IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v96y2009i4p991-997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semiparametric methods for evaluating risk prediction markers in case-control studies

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Huang
  • Margaret Sullivan Pepe

Abstract

The performance of a well-calibrated risk model for a binary disease outcome can be characterized by the population distribution of risk and displayed with the predictiveness curve. Better performance is characterized by a wider distribution of risk, since this corresponds to better risk stratification in the sense that more subjects are identified at low and high risk for the disease outcome. Although methods have been developed to estimate predictiveness curves from cohort studies, most studies to evaluate novel risk prediction markers employ case-control designs. Here we develop semiparametric methods that accommodate case-control data. The semiparametric methods are flexible, and naturally generalize methods previously developed for cohort data. Applications to prostate cancer risk prediction markers illustrate the methods. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Huang & Margaret Sullivan Pepe, 2009. "Semiparametric methods for evaluating risk prediction markers in case-control studies," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(4), pages 991-997.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:96:y:2009:i:4:p:991-997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asp040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Y. Huang & M. S. Pepe, 2010. "Semiparametric methods for evaluating the covariateā€specific predictiveness of continuous markers in matched caseā€“control studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 437-456, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:96:y:2009:i:4:p:991-997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.