IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v96y2009i3p691-709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of functionals in linearization and composite estimation with application to two-sample survey data

Author

Listed:
  • C. Goga
  • J.-C. Deville
  • A. Ruiz-Gazen

Abstract

An important problem associated with two-sample surveys is the estimation of nonlinear functions of finite population totals such as ratios, correlation coefficients or measures of income inequality. Computation and estimation of the variance of such complex statistics are made more difficult by the existence of overlapping units. In one-sample surveys, the linearization method based on the influence function approach is a powerful tool for variance estimation. We introduce a two-sample linearization technique that can be viewed as a generalization of the one-sample influence function approach. Our technique is based on expressing the parameters of interest as multivariate functionals of finite and discrete measures and then using partial influence functions to compute the linearized variables. Under broad assumptions, the asymptotic variance of the substitution estimator, derived from Deville (1999), is shown to be the variance of a weighted sum of the linearized variables. The paper then focuses on a general class of composite substitution estimators, and from this class the optimal estimator for minimizing the asymptotic variance is obtained. The efficiency of the optimal composite estimator is demonstrated through an empirical study. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Goga & J.-C. Deville & A. Ruiz-Gazen, 2009. "Use of functionals in linearization and composite estimation with application to two-sample survey data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 691-709.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:96:y:2009:i:3:p:691-709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asp039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jianqiang C., 2012. "Sample distribution function based goodness-of-fit test for complex surveys," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 664-679.
    2. Yves G. Berger & Emilio L. Escobar, 2017. "Variance Estimation of Imputed Estimators of Change for Repeated Rotating Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 421-438, December.
    3. Dioggban Jakperik & Romanus Otieno Odhiambo & George Otieno Orwa, 2019. "Inference on poverty indicators for Ghana," Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:96:y:2009:i:3:p:691-709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.