IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v93y2006i3p671-686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models for interval censoring and simulation-based inference for lifetime distributions

Author

Listed:
  • J. F. Lawless
  • Denise Babineau

Abstract

Interval-censored lifetime data arise when individuals in a study are inspected intermittently so that a lifetime is observed to lie between two successive times. In settings where only these two times are available, methods exist for nonparametric or parametric estimation of lifetime distributions. However, there has been virtually no discussion of how inspection processes may be estimated or identified. Such estimates are needed if one is to generate interval-censored data by simulation. This paper identifies which aspects of an independent inspection process are estimable from interval-censored data, and shows how to obtain nonparametric estimates. The results allow interval-censored data from any specified distribution to be generated, and give new simulation procedures for estimation or testing. A new omnibus goodness-of-fit test is introduced. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • J. F. Lawless & Denise Babineau, 2006. "Models for interval censoring and simulation-based inference for lifetime distributions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(3), pages 671-686, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:93:y:2006:i:3:p:671-686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/93.3.671
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soumya Roy & Biswabrata Pradhan, 2023. "Inference for log‐location‐scale family of distributions under competing risks with progressive type‐I interval censored data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(2), pages 208-232, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:93:y:2006:i:3:p:671-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.