IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v93y2006i1p127-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient designs for one-sided comparisons of two or three treatments with a control in a one-way layout

Author

Listed:
  • Steven M. Bortnick
  • Angela M. Dean
  • Thomas J. Santner

Abstract

The problem of providing lower confidence bounds for the mean improvements of p >= 2 test treatments over a control treatment is considered. The expected average and expected maximum allowances are two criteria for comparing different systems of confidence intervals or bounds. In this paper, lower bounds are derived for the expected average allowance and the expected maximum allowance of Dunnett's simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the p mean improvements. These lower bounds hold for any p >= 2 and any allocation of sample sizes. For p = 2 test treatments, sample allocations are given for which the bounds are achievable. For p = 3 test treatments, a tighter set of bounds is derived which enables easy determination of the sample allocation required to achieve highly efficient designs. A table of the bounds for the expected average and expected maximum allowances and the sample allocation that achieves these bounds is given for p = 2, 3. The theoretical results can easily be adapted to cover upper confidence bounds. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven M. Bortnick & Angela M. Dean & Thomas J. Santner, 2006. "Efficient designs for one-sided comparisons of two or three treatments with a control in a one-way layout," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(1), pages 127-135, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:93:y:2006:i:1:p:127-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/93.1.127
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:93:y:2006:i:1:p:127-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.