IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v92y2005i3p679-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Orthogonal bases approach for comparing nonnormal continuous distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Inna Chervoneva
  • Boris Iglewicz

Abstract

We present an orthonormal bases approach for detecting general differences among continuous distributions. An unknown density function is represented by a finite vector of its estimated Fourier coefficients with respect to a suitable orthonormal basis. For a wide class of orthonormal bases, we establish asymptotic normality of the vector of estimated Fourier coefficients and propose an unbiased and consistent estimator of its asymptotic covariance matrix. Fourier coeffients are modelled as functions of fixed and possibly random effects. This approach allows simultaneous detection of distributional differences attributable to various factors in clustered and correlated data with suffciently large numbers of observations per each cluster with the same fixed and random effects realisations. This work was motivated by multi-level clustered non-Gaussian datasets from genetic studies. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Inna Chervoneva & Boris Iglewicz, 2005. "Orthogonal bases approach for comparing nonnormal continuous distributions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(3), pages 679-690, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:92:y:2005:i:3:p:679-690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/92.3.679
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denys Pommeret, 2013. "A two-sample test when data are contaminated," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(4), pages 501-516, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:92:y:2005:i:3:p:679-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.