IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v112y2025i2p333-43..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing variable importance in survival analysis using machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • C J Wolock
  • P B Gilbert
  • N Simon
  • M Carone

Abstract

SummaryGiven a collection of features available for inclusion in a predictive model, it may be of interest to quantify the relative importance of a subset of features for the prediction task at hand. For example, in HIV vaccine trials, participant baseline characteristics are used to predict the probability of HIV acquisition over the intended follow-up period, and investigators may wish to understand how much certain types of predictors, such as behavioural factors, contribute to overall predictiveness. Time-to-event outcomes such as time to HIV acquisition are often subject to right censoring, and existing methods for assessing variable importance are typically not intended to be used in this setting. We describe a broad class of algorithm-agnostic variable importance measures for prediction in the context of survival data. We propose a nonparametric efficient estimation procedure that incorporates flexible learning of nuisance parameters, yields asymptotically valid inference and enjoys double robustness. We assess the performance of our proposed procedure via numerical simulations and analyse data from the HVTN 702 vaccine trial to inform enrolment strategies for future HIV vaccine trials.

Suggested Citation

  • C J Wolock & P B Gilbert & N Simon & M Carone, 2025. "Assessing variable importance in survival analysis using machine learning," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(2), pages 333-343.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:2:p:333-43.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asae061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:2:p:333-43.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.