IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v112y2025i1p133-61..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust covariate-balancing method for learning optimal individualized treatment regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Canhui Li
  • Donglin Zeng
  • Wensheng Zhu

Abstract

One of the most important problems in precision medicine is to find the optimal individualized treatment rule, which is designed to recommend treatment decisions and maximize overall clinical benefit to patients based on their individual characteristics. Typically, the expected clinical outcome is required to be estimated first, for which an outcome regression model or a propensity score model usually needs to be assumed with most existing statistical methods. However, if either model assumption is invalid, the estimated treatment regime will not be reliable. In this article, we first define a contrast value function, which forms the basis for the study of individualized treatment regimes. Then we construct a hybrid estimator of the contrast value function by combining two types of estimation methods. We further propose a robust covariate-balancing estimator of the contrast value function by combining the inverse probability weighted method and matching method, which is based on the covariate balancing propensity score proposed by Imai & Ratkovic (2014). Theoretical results show that the proposed estimator is doubly robust, ie, it is consistent if either the propensity score model or the matching is correct. Based on a large number of simulation studies, we demonstrate that the proposed estimator outperforms existing methods. Application of the proposed method is illustrated through analysis of the SUPPORT study.

Suggested Citation

  • Canhui Li & Donglin Zeng & Wensheng Zhu, 2025. "A robust covariate-balancing method for learning optimal individualized treatment regimes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 112(1), pages 133-161.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:1:p:133-61.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asae036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:112:y:2025:i:1:p:133-61.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.